Viktor Frankl on the Human Seek for Which means – The Marginalian

Celebrated Austrian psychiatrist and Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl (March 26, 1905–September 2, 1997) stays best-known for his indispensable 1946 psychological memoir Man’s Seek for Which means (public library) — a meditation on what the grotesque expertise of Auschwitz taught him concerning the main function of life: the hunt for which means, which sustained those that survived.

For Frankl, which means got here from three doable sources: purposeful work, love, and braveness within the face of issue.

In analyzing the “intensification of inside life” that helped prisoners keep alive, he considers the transcendental energy of affection:

Love goes very far past the bodily individual of the beloved. It finds its deepest which means in his non secular being, his inside self. Whether or not or not he’s really current, whether or not or not he’s nonetheless alive in any respect, ceases one way or the other to be of significance.

Frankl illustrates this with a stirring instance of how his emotions for his spouse — who was ultimately killed within the camps — gave him a way of which means:

We had been at work in a trench. The daybreak was gray round us; gray was the sky above; gray the snow within the pale gentle of daybreak; gray the rags during which my fellow prisoners had been clad, and gray their faces. I used to be once more conversing silently with my spouse, or maybe I used to be struggling to seek out the cause for my sufferings, my gradual dying. In a final violent protest towards the hopelessness of imminent loss of life, I sensed my spirit piercing by way of the enveloping gloom. I felt it transcend that hopeless, meaningless world, and from someplace I heard a victorious “Sure” in reply to my query of the existence of an final function. At that second a lightweight was lit in a distant farmhouse, which stood on the horizon as if painted there, within the midst of the depressing gray of a dawning morning in Bavaria. “Et lux in tenebris lucet” — and the sunshine shineth within the darkness. For hours I stood hacking on the icy floor. The guard handed by, insulting me, and as soon as once more I communed with my beloved. An increasing number of I felt that she was current, that she was with me; I had the sensation that I used to be in a position to contact her, in a position to stretch out my hand and grasp hers. The sensation was very robust: she was there. Then, at that very second, a fowl flew down silently and perched simply in entrance of me, on the heap of soil which I had dug up from the ditch, and seemed steadily at me.

Of humor, “one other of the soul’s weapons within the combat for self-preservation,” Frankl writes:

It’s well-known that humor, greater than the rest within the human make-up, can afford an aloofness and a capability to rise above any state of affairs, even when just for a number of seconds. … The try and develop a humorousness and to see issues in a humorous gentle is a few sort of a trick realized whereas mastering the artwork of dwelling. But it’s doable to follow the artwork of dwelling even in a focus camp, though struggling is omnipresent.

Lithograph by Leo Haas, Holocaust artist who survived Theresienstadt and Auschwitz (public area)

After discussing the widespread psychological patterns that unfold in inmates, Frankl is cautious to problem the idea that human beings are invariably formed by their circumstances. He writes:

However what about human liberty? Is there no non secular freedom in regard to habits and response to any given environment? … Most vital, do the prisoners’ reactions to the singular world of the focus camp show that man can not escape the influences of his environment? Does man don’t have any alternative of motion within the face of such circumstances?

We are able to reply these questions from expertise in addition to on precept. The experiences of camp life present that man does have a alternative of motion. … Man can protect a vestige of non secular freedom, of independence of thoughts, even in such horrible circumstances of psychic and bodily stress.


The whole lot might be taken from a person however one factor: the final of the human freedoms — to decide on one’s angle in any given set of circumstances, to decide on one’s personal method.

Very similar to William James did in his treatise on behavior, Frankl locations this notion of on a regular basis alternative on the epicenter of the human expertise:

Day by day, each hour, provided the chance to decide, a choice which decided whether or not you’ll or wouldn’t undergo these powers which threatened to rob you of your very self, your inside freedom; which decided whether or not or not you’ll develop into the plaything of circumstance, renouncing freedom and dignity to develop into molded into the type of the standard inmate.

Like Henry Miller and Philip Okay. Dick, Frankl acknowledges struggling as a necessary piece not solely of existence however of the significant life:

If there’s a which means in life in any respect, then there have to be a which means in struggling. Struggling is an ineradicable a part of life, whilst destiny and loss of life. With out struggling and loss of life human life can’t be full.

The best way during which a person accepts his destiny and all of the struggling it entails, the way in which during which he takes up his cross, offers him ample alternative — even underneath probably the most troublesome circumstances — so as to add a deeper which means to his life. It could stay courageous, dignified and unselfish. Or within the bitter combat for self-preservation he could overlook his human dignity and develop into not more than an animal. Right here lies the possibility for a person both to utilize or to forgo the alternatives of achieving the ethical values {that a} troublesome state of affairs could afford him. And this decides whether or not he’s worthy of his sufferings or not. … Such males aren’t solely in focus camps. In all places man is confronted with destiny, with the possibility of attaining one thing by way of his personal struggling.

In working as a psychiatrist to the inmates, Frankl discovered that the one most vital consider cultivating the sort of “inside maintain” that allowed males to outlive was instructing them to carry within the thoughts’s grip some future purpose. He cites Nietzsche’s, who wrote that “He who has a why to dwell for can bear with virtually any how,” and admonishes towards generalization:

Woe to him who noticed no extra sense in his life, no purpose, no function, and due to this fact no level in carrying on. He was quickly misplaced. The standard reply with which such a person rejected all encouraging arguments was, “I’ve nothing to anticipate from life any extra.” What kind of reply can one give to that?

What was actually wanted was a elementary change in our angle towards life. We needed to be taught ourselves and, moreover, we needed to train the despairing males, that it didn’t actually matter what we anticipated from life, however quite what life anticipated from us. We would have liked to cease asking concerning the which means of life, and as an alternative to think about ourselves as those that had been being questioned by life — each day and hourly. Our reply should consist, not in speak and meditation, however in proper motion and in proper conduct. Life finally means taking the accountability to seek out the correct reply to its issues and to satisfy the duties which it consistently units for every particular person.

These duties, and due to this fact the which means of life, differ from man to man, and from second to second. Thus it’s not possible to outline the which means of life in a basic method. Questions concerning the which means of life can by no means be answered by sweeping statements. “Life” doesn’t imply one thing imprecise, however one thing very actual and concrete, simply as life’s duties are additionally very actual and concrete. They type man’s future, which is completely different and distinctive for every particular person. No man and no future might be in contrast with another man or another future. No state of affairs repeats itself, and every state of affairs requires a unique response. Typically the state of affairs during which a person finds himself could require him to form his personal destiny by motion. At different instances it’s extra advantageous for him to utilize a chance for contemplation and to understand belongings on this method. Typically man could also be required merely to just accept destiny, to bear his cross. Each state of affairs is distinguished by its uniqueness, and there’s all the time just one proper reply to the issue posed by the state of affairs at hand.

Lithograph by Leo Haas, Holocaust artist who survived Theresienstadt and Auschwitz (public area)

In contemplating the human capability for good and evil and the circumstances that deliver out indecency in respectable individuals, Frankl writes:

Human kindness might be present in all teams, even these which as an entire it will be straightforward to sentence. The boundaries between teams overlapped and we should not attempt to simplify issues by saying that these males had been angels and people had been devils.


From all this we could be taught that there are two races of males on this world, however solely these two — the “race” of the respectable man and the “race” of the indecent man. Each are discovered in all places; they penetrate into all teams of society. No group consists completely of respectable or indecent individuals. On this sense, no group is of “pure race” — and due to this fact one sometimes discovered an honest fellow among the many camp guards.

Life in a focus camp tore open the human soul and uncovered its depths. Is it shocking that in these depths we once more discovered solely human qualities which of their very nature had been a combination of fine and evil? The rift dividing good from evil, which fits by way of all human beings, reaches into the bottom depths and turns into obvious even on the underside of the abyss which is laid open by the focus camp.

The second half of the e book presents Frankl’s singular type of existential evaluation, which he termed “logotherapy” — a technique of therapeutic the soul by cultivating the capability to discover a significant life:

Finally, man shouldn’t ask what the which means of his life is, however quite he should acknowledge that it’s he who’s requested. In a phrase, every man is questioned by life; and he can solely reply to life by answering for his personal life; to life he can solely reply by being accountable. Thus, logotherapy sees in responsibleness the very essence of human existence.

This emphasis on responsibleness is mirrored within the categorical crucial of logotherapy, which is: “Dwell as in the event you had been dwelling already for the second time and as in the event you had acted the primary time as wrongly as you’re about to behave now!”

Frankl contributes to historical past’s richest definitions of affection:

Love is the one method to grasp one other human being within the innermost core of his character. Nobody can develop into absolutely conscious of the very essence of one other human being until he loves him. By his love he’s enabled to see the important traits and options within the beloved individual; and much more, he sees that which is potential in him, which isn’t but actualized however but must be actualized. Moreover, by his love, the loving individual permits the beloved individual to actualize these potentialities. By making him conscious of what he might be and of what he ought to develop into, he makes these potentialities come true.

Frankl wrote the e book over the course of 9 consecutive days, with the unique intention of publishing it anonymously, however upon his buddies’ insistent recommendation, he added his identify within the final minute. Within the introduction to the 1992 version, in reflecting upon the tens of millions of copies offered within the half-century for the reason that unique publication, Frankl makes a poignant meta-comment about one thing George Saunders just lately echoed, noting:

Within the first place I do by no means see within the bestseller standing of my e book an achievement and accomplishment on my half however quite an expression of the distress of our time: if tons of of hundreds of individuals attain out for a e book whose very title guarantees to cope with the query of a which means to life, it have to be a query that burns underneath their fingernails. … At first, nonetheless, it had been written with absolutely the conviction that, as an nameless opus, it may by no means earn its writer literary fame.

In the identical introduction, he shares a bit of timeless recommendation on success he usually offers his college students:

Don’t purpose at success — the extra you purpose at it and make it a goal, the extra you will miss it. For achievement, like happiness, can’t be pursued; it should ensue, and it solely does in order the unintended side-effect of 1’s dedication to a trigger higher than oneself or because the by-product of 1’s give up to an individual apart from oneself. Happiness should occur, and the identical holds for achievement: you must let it occur by not caring about it. I need you to hearken to what your conscience instructions you to do and go on to hold it out to the most effective of your data. Then you’ll dwell to see that in the long term—in the long term, I say!—success will observe you exactly since you had forgotten to think about it.

(Hugh MacLeod famously articulated the identical sentiment when he wrote that “One of the simplest ways to get approval is to not want it.”)

If there ever had been a common studying record of existential necessities, Man’s Seek for Which means would, and not using a shadow of a doubt, be on it.

Most Popular

To Top